|

We have a shared vision for Burrells Wharf that can
be summarised as follows:
"That Burrells Wharf be recognised by residents, potential
residents and local estate agents as the most desirable dev- elopment
in which to live on the Isle Of Dogs." To achieve this
aim we propose:
1.To maintain transparency and integrity in all relation
ships; amongst the Directors, between the Directors and Shareholders,
Managing Agents, estate staff, employed lawyers & accountants.
2.To make, keep and maintain full accounts & complete records
of all meetings and key telephone conversations and correspondence
on the part of the Directors.
3.The Directors will take a rigorous and active interest in the
running of the estate.
4.The Directors are committed to high quality communication, particularly
with the Shareholders, and hold the Managing Agents accountable
for the same.
|
Many leaseholders
will be wondering about the latest developments regarding the defects
found at Burrells Wharf. Some of you may have attended the open meeting
at the Octagon on 29th April 1999. Some 150 people attended, for those
who did not attend you were sent an information pack and the minutes
of that meeting so you would have had all the information that was
discussed at that meeting. We think it is important to cover these
issues again, give an historical out-line of events, [some parts of
this story could not be disclosed by BWFL as there was a legal case
ongoing by a resident on the estate against Galliards, more about
this later]and to give you the latest developments at the time of
this newsletter being published.
Background
As you will know by now, when BWFL purchased the Freehold we undertook
a Health and Safety audit of the Estate. This was to cover our legal
responsibilities required by law. Also, before BWFL bought the Freehold,
there was a fire in the rubbish chute of the Wheelhouse. As a result
of this it became apparent that there were defects in the alarm
systems across the whole Estate, and the smoke vents of the building.
The fire was investigated by fire investigators from the London
Fire Brigade,
On to page 2
|
their report
confirmed that the the smoke vents did not function properly and the
fire alarm panel in the estate office did not activate. When BWFL
commissioned its audit the TBA[Troupe Bywaters Anders] Services Management
Ltd was asked also to look at these defects which had been highlighted.
Their report has now become known as the TBA report. The directors
decided to implement this report in its entirety. We budgeted for
it in this years’ service charges and issued emergency consultation
notices to all leaseholders late last year.We will come back to this
later.
Defects - BWFL made aware
In October 1998, completely unexpectedly, we received some disturbing
information from Fairweather Stephenson. They told us that for some
time they had been acting for a client, Sundelta Ltd, who owned
a penthouse flat on top of the Wheelhouse. Sundelta Ltd had bought
this flat from new from Galliards and was in litigation against
them regarding a number of defects. Apart from a short while when
a tenant rented the flat, the flat had not been occupied because
it was in an unletable state.
|
The owner did
not for some time tell BWFL of this situation. However as part of
the litigation they needed to inspect the common parts of the block
owned by BWFL.So they approached us, this now made us aware of a problem
for the first time.[Though the TBA report had revealed some defects]
We asked to speak to the surveyor [Chris Easton] employed to give
us an outline of what the problem was. He told us that he was uncovering,
after superficial inspection, defects in the building. This had revealed
breaches of the fire integrity of the wall to the ducts and to some
of the flats, as well as inappropriate hinges to the fire doors, inadequate
smoke dispersal and notification systems. All indicated breaches of
building regulations and which made the building unsafe in the event
of a fire. This was even before a more rigorous inspection had been
undertaken. BWFL was now faced with a potentially serious situation
whereby we had an Estate that was potentially unsafe. This could have
had serious consequences for all our investments here and there was
a real danger of the Estate being blighted. We had a duty to inform
the insurance company who insure the Estate and we had to in |